Case Snapshot
In June 2025, the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP) published a trademark application filed by a third party (covering Class 12: automobiles and related parts). The applied-for mark was highly similar to our client's—a renowned Chinese automobile manufacturer—previously registered and actively used trademark in Saudi Arabia. This posed a significant risk of consumer confusion and threatened to undermine our client's brand equity and commercial strategy in the Saudi market.
Our Action & Strategy
After a thorough analysis of the legal risks and the degree of similarity, we promptly formulated a comprehensive opposition strategy for our client. In accordance with relevant Saudi laws and regulations, we formally filed a thorough and well-reasoned opposition with the SAIP within the statutory period (in August 2025). The submission clearly outlined the legal violations and the impropriety of the conflicting mark's registration.
Successful Outcome
Approximately one month after our opposition was filed, in September 2025, the status of the disputed trademark on the SAIP official publication platform was updated to "Voluntary Removal." Our verification confirmed that the applicant failed to submit any counter-statement or defense within the stipulated timeframe, meaning they had actively abandoned the registration process. Consequently, the trademark is now invalid and unregistrable.
While the SAIP has not yet issued a formal decision on this opposition, the applicant's choice to voluntarily withdraw in the face of our professional legal challenge achieved our client's core objective: eliminating the trademark conflict risk in a highly efficient and cost-effective manner.
Case Significance
This case is another testament to our capabilities in overseas IP protection. Through precise risk monitoring, a swift response mechanism, and robust legal documentation, we successfully resolved the conflict before any formal opposition ruling, thereby sparing our client from potential protracted administrative proceedings and litigation risks.
This outcome reaffirms that in international trademark protection, an integrated strategy of proactive monitoring, immediate action, and professional legal argumentation can often secure a substantive victory prior to the completion of formal administrative procedures. This approach saves clients significant time and resources while enhancing the overall effectiveness of their overseas intellectual property protection.
鄂公网安备 42010402001546号