When the Korean version of Chayan Yuese (茶颜悦色) emerged on the streets of Seoul’s Myeongdong district, the Chinese beverage phenomenon found itself entangled in a classic globalization dilemma: international trademark squatting. After a three-year legal battle, the brand ultimately withdrew from the South Korean market, exposing systemic vulnerabilities in intellectual property management that plague companies worldwide. This case underscores a harsh reality—neglecting trademark strategy can derail even the most promising global expansion efforts.
The Hidden Crisis of Cross-Border Trademark Conflicts
The Chayan Yuese incident mirrors risks faced by companies across industries. A multinational tech giant discovered its "Tesla" trademark preemptively registered in India, triggering a five-year legal saga. Nintendo faced delayed merchandise launches in Brazil due to a "Pokémon" trademark hijacking. A century-old German kitchenware brand encountered over 100 counterfeit trademarks in Southeast Asia, with legal costs surpassing its initial market-entry budget.
Behind these crises lie two critical misjudgments:
1. Strategic Fragmentation: many companies treat market expansion and IP protection as sequential steps rather than integrated priorities.
2. Cost Miscalculation: Attempts to save thousands in registration fees often lead to millions in litigation expenses.
The Shadow Industry of Trademark Hijacking
The rampant practice of international trademark squatting has evolved from isolated opportunistic acts into a sophisticated gray industry. Professional squatters, exploiting loopholes in national trademark laws, systematically target two types of enterprises: rapidly emerging consumer brands—such as trendy bubble tea chains and viral food concepts—and technology-driven innovators in fields like AI and smart hardware.
Their tactics typically follow a three-phase playbook:
1. Trend Monitoring: Identifying high-potential brands through social media buzz and industry reports.
2. Preemptive Registration: Filing trademark applications in target markets before the original brand owners.
3. Profit Extraction: Either reselling trademarks at exorbitant prices or operating counterfeit businesses for quick gains.
Alarmingly, such actions increasingly carry strategic motives. For instance, a cross-border e-commerce platform’s IPO plans were derailed when competitors flooded its target markets with trademark registrations, creating legal gridlock.
Building a Global Trademark Defense System
1. Proactive Mapping
Businesses must align trademark strategies with global expansion roadmaps. Critical markets should be categorized into tiers:
· Immediate registration in active markets
· Preemptive filing (2-3 years ahead) in planned markets
· Continuous monitoring for potential future territories
Registration pathways should combine the Madrid System (covering 125 countries), regional frameworks like the EU Trademark, and country-specific filings for strategic markets.
2. Multi-Layered Safeguards
Comprehensive protection requires:
· Diverse trademark formats: Text, logos, localized translations (e.g., Huawei’s dual registration of “HUAWEI” and its Chinese characters), and abbreviations.
· Cross-category coverage: A milk tea brand, for example, must secure not only Class 30 (food products) but also Classes 43 (food services) and 35 (advertising).
· Domain integration: Registering country-specific domains (e.g., .kr, .jp) alongside trademarks.
3. Agile Response Mechanisms
Establish real-time monitoring through official databases and specialized platforms to track global trademark filings. Regular scans of trademark bulletins in key markets can identify squatting risks early. Predefined crisis protocols should include:
· Immediate legal actions (oppositions, cancellations) upon detecting squatting
· Leveraging international conventions like the Paris Convention to expedite rights claims
· Partnerships with local law firms for rapid enforcement
4. Strategies for Resource-Limited Enterprises
Small and medium-sized businesses can adopt focused tactics:
· Prioritize registration in core markets (e.g., the U.S. and EU for cross-border e-commerce).
· Concentrate resources on core business categories while deferring peripheral registrations.
· Utilize cost-saving models like collective trademarks, exemplified by the Shaxian Delicacies Association’s global trademark network.
Epilogue: Trademarks as Global Business Passports
The case of Chayan Yuese underscores a harsh truth: In borderless commerce, trademarks transcend legal symbols to become strategic assets. As the International Trademark Association (INTA) warns, “Companies neglecting trademark strategy are soldiers entering battle unarmed.” In today’s global arena, securing trademarks isn’t merely defense—it’s the first offensive move in conquering new frontiers.
鄂公网安备 42010402001546号