Health Concepts vs. Trademark Design: A Delicate Balance
Chinese condiment brand Qianhe Flavor recently faced public backlash after trace amounts of cadmium, a heavy metal, were detected in its "Qianhe 0" soy sauce. Consumers criticized the trademark's prominent "0" as implying "zero additives," sparking debates over misleading branding. While the company insists "Qianhe 0" is merely a registered trademark unrelated to "zero additives," the public widely associates the stylized "0" with health claims, highlighting a disconnect between design intent and consumer perception.
Key Controversy Points
1. Mismatch Between Trademark Design and Consumer Expectations
o The "Qianhe 0" logo centers on an enlarged "0," paired with marketing emphasizing "zero additives," leading consumers to equate "0" with "no additives." However, the brand clarifies that "zero additives" refers to specific claims on ingredient labels, without explicitly defining the "0" symbol.
o Legally, while the trademark registration is valid, promotional or packaging designs implying functional claims (e.g., "zero additives") may violate China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law (false advertising) or Trademark Law (deceptive marks).
2. Lack of Industry Standards and Regulatory Gaps
o Current trademark审查 (examinations) inadequately address "suggestive symbols" like "0," enabling companies to exploit symbolic marketing while risking consumer trust crises.
Recommendations for Enterprise Trademark Strategy
Drawing lessons from the "Qianhe 0" incident, businesses should prioritize the following during trademark design and registration:
1. Avoid Misleading Symbols; Clarify Trademark Meaning
o Use Caution with Numbers/Symbols: If trademarks include "0," "无" (wu, meaning "no"), or "零" (ling, meaning "zero"), explicitly define their purpose during registration to avoid associations with functional claims.
o Provide Context: On packaging and in promotions, label the trademark as purely symbolic (e.g., "Qianhe 0 is a registered trademark, not a guarantee of ingredients").
2. Ensure Compliance to Mitigate Legal Risks
o Avoid Conceptual Overlap: If trademarks relate to product attributes (e.g., health, safety), ensure promotional content aligns strictly with actual product features, refraining from exploiting informational gaps.
3. Proactive Trademark Protection and Defensive Strategies
o Multi-Dimensional Registration: Beyond core trademarks, register similar variations (e.g., "Qianhe Ling," "Qianhe 0+") to prevent counterfeiting or模仿 (imitation).
o International Registration: For exported products, register trademarks in target markets to avoid cultural misinterpretations (e.g., "0" may signify "worthless" in some regions).
4. Foster Transparency and Consumer Trust
o Proactive Disclosure: Clearly explain trademark rationale and product standards (e.g., specifying excluded additives for "zero additives" claims) on official websites and product pages.
o Crisis Response Plans: In case of trademark disputes, promptly provide compliant test reports or third-party certifications to minimize reputational damage.
Conclusion
The "Qianhe 0" controversy underscores the risks of "symbolic games" in trademark design. While pursuing innovative marketing, enterprises must prioritize ethical integrity, using trademarks as cornerstones of trust rather than speculative tools. Only through compliant design, transparent communication, and forward-looking strategies can businesses achieve sustainable growth in health-conscious markets.
鄂公网安备 42010402001546号